[ad_1]
An executive producer of The simpsons Recently dismissed fan annoyance over the show’s inconsistent continuity and non-existent canon, but these issues are responsible for many of the biggest problems critics and viewers have with the show. Since the start of the series in 1989, The simpsons was never too concerned with canon or continuity. A few The Simpsons the characters died and remained dead over the series’ 32 seasons, but this handful of events generally had more to do with the availability of the cast than the desire to establish a formal canon.
Like most animated sitcoms, The simpsons rather played fast and freely with his own cannon. It made the show some hilarious moments, but it also stole The simpsons potentially poignant character in recent years, as the inconsistent characterization and storyline makes the cast of characters more difficult to consider. For the creators, however, the continuity of the series is obviously not a concern.
Producer Matt Selman said The Simpsons fans chill out about canon in the show, and in doing so, the executive producer has addressed one of the show’s biggest issues. If the elements that contribute to the critical decline of The simpsons (like celebrities playing themselves) the lack of clear continuity robs viewers of any reason to really invest in the characters. Although Selman claims the absurd comic book comedy of The simpsons is stupid enough to rule out the need for consistency, this South Park-Style defense doesn’t make sense for a show that wants to create characters with lovable, instantly recognizable characters. A lack of continuity contributes directly to the inconsistent characterization of The simpsons‘, resulting in phenomena like “Jerkass Homer” and wider fan disgust for the show’s final seasons.
Selman’s comments on Simpsons Canon
When an episode, “Do Pizza Bots Dream of Electric Guitars: (Season 32, Episode 15) portrayed Homer as a teenager in the ’90s, fans were understandably annoyed. The simpsonsTreehouse of Horror releases have always flouted canon, the show itself generally hasn’t taken a totally dismissive approach to the idea of ​​internal consistency, until now. Fan anger prompted a response from Selman, who took to Twitter to explain that:
“The Simpsons is a 32 year old series where the characters don’t age, so the ‘canon’ has to be springy / contradictory / silly. That doesn’t mean other classic @TheSimpsons flashback shows haven’t happened. None of this happened. Everything is invented. Each episode is its own Groundhog Day which only makes sense for that story (if it does). There is no “canon” or “non-canon” @TheSimpsons.‘”
Selman’s justification that The simpsons This fiction is not only condescending evidence, nor does it hold up when the series simultaneously attempts to be an up-to-date satire on cultural and social mores. Requirement “everything is invented” makes The simpsons” the then recent and critical attempts at political comments which were also impossible to justify, because if The simpsons is a stupid, playful extravagant series where nothing is coherent, it would be a poor vector of significant satire of the news.
Why The Simpsons Can’t Use The South Park Approach
Written to respond to weekly world events, the extremely current (and sometimes prescient) stories of South Park are also loose when it comes to barrel issues. However, this series may succeed this approach because continuity is sacrificed for the sake of timeliness and comedic efficiency, while The simpsons abandoned the cannon without any justification. The latter’s humor has grown more cartoonish over the decades, but audiences never wanted the show to be Looney Tunes, so Selman’s rationale does not match. If anything, pretend there isn’t The Simpsons canon weakens the show’s ability to make sharp satirical comments, as it excuses a lack of consistency.
The problem of the “paradoxical continuity” of the Simpsons
A phrase borrowed from Selman’s tweets, the term “Paradoxical continuityâ€Perfectly sums up the problem with the (non-) canon of The simpsons. The show, like South Park, always tries to comment on contemporary society and satire current pop culture (as embodied by a series of failures Strange things parodies). At a time, The simpsons does not want to be surrounded by continuity. Without the characters having a clear age (Is Homer a Boomer? A Gen X-er? A Millennial?), The parodied tendencies don’t have a solid anchor, and the parodies are toothless at best.
At the time of their release, animated comedy shows that ripped off The simpsons As The Capitol Creatures were accused of not having a target audience because their satire was too sweet for adult viewers but confusing for children. In his last seasons, The simpsons seems to have taken this approach, even unintentionally, as the nonexistent canon and PG-rated comedy make incisive satire a rare sight. Many animated comedies like South Park Where american father boast an equally non-existent continuity (aside from the brief attempts to serialize the former), but both also have a more mature rating and the ability to tell darker stories. This gives both series the creative freedom to make shocking and hard-hitting jokes, while more family-friendly animated shows like Bob’s burgers succeed by establishing an adorable cast of misfits and, most importantly, by containing their misadventures in a clear continuity.
Why The Simpsons Need Cannon
Despite The simpsons Influencing all of these later series, the series failed to find its place in the wake of the success of its imitators, and its lack of continuity is central to it. If creators want the freedom to create series like South Park, they need to add more mature humor to The simpsons, which is currently more cartoonish than ever. If the series hopes to restore the warm, PG-rated atmosphere of its early years, it needs to pay more attention to the canon and give viewers a reason to care about these characters by giving them a more solid and engaging backstory. Dividing the difference has already resulted in the continuing critical decline of The simpsons, and the gradual loss of fan interest in what was once the crowning glory of television comedy.
About the Author
[ad_2]